6 Months later. Just flashed the Core S3 with the newest UiFlow 2.0 Alpha and still the modules are not integrated!
Do you really want to sell the Core S3 ? without complete software support, the use cases for the Core S3 is very, very limited.
Best posts made by sgu
-
RE: UiFlow 2.0 discuss(how-to, bug, feature request or sometings)
-
USB Module with MAX3421E fully integration into UIFlow
The USB Module is only partially isable.
The GPIOs and a HID Mouse are accessible.
It is missing a HID-Keyboard integration and the integration as USB-Serial Port for Data Communication. -
Atom Display with USB for Touschscreen
A very nice tool, the M5Stack Atom Display.
Finally, we can connect a bigger display where needed.
But it lacks the connection of the touchscreen, a keyboard or a Mouse and the graphical options as there are for the Core 2.So what is missing is an USB connection and an integration for the touch screen..
Adding additionally the LVGL to UIFlow would create a killer application! -
RE: UiFlow 2.0 discuss(how-to, bug, feature request or sometings)
@ajb2k3 said in UiFlow 2.0 Alpha verison discuss(how-to, bug, feature request or sometings):
@flex Some people and groups cant use the cloud platform and so local programming like with the microbic and RPI is needed for them
This is true. If you build an internal application for a company on the internal network, the devices will not have cloud access or they have to switch always the wlan.
A Desktop uiflow version is still a good alternative to the cloud version ! -
RE: UiFlow 2.0 discuss(how-to, bug, feature request or sometings)
The M5Stack Core S3 is now released for 6 Months and still the uiflow 2.0 is in beta phase and supports 2 Mopdules only.
I'm asking me for what the Core S3 can be used ?.In the M5 Burner, there is no UI Flow 1.x for the Core S3!
So at the moment the Core S3 has only limited functionality with the UI Flowe in alpha version.
Is this the quality of M5 Stack ?