M5Paper I2C

Powersoft

@felmue Thank you Felix. What strikes me now is that the original I2C address 0x30 has been changed to 0x58. Does this mean that I have to edit the original LIB of Adafruit?
Or is there a trick to keep using the address 0x30?
Cheers
Jan

Powersoft

Felix,
Sorry, I made a mistake. The address the scanner sees is 0x58, which is correct. The address of the SGP30 is also 0x58.

Still, the test program will not run!

#include <M5EPD.h>
#include <Wire.h>
#include "Adafruit_SGP30.h"

Adafruit_SGP30 sgp;

void setup() {
  M5.begin();
  Serial.println("\n\n=====SGP30 test====");

  if (! sgp.begin()){
    Serial.println("Sensor not found ...........");
    while (1);
  }
  Serial.print("Found SGP30 serial #");
  Serial.print(sgp.serialnumber[0], HEX);
  Serial.print(sgp.serialnumber[1], HEX);
  Serial.println(sgp.serialnumber[2], HEX);
}

void loop()
{
}

This is my message now:

21:20:51.388 -> 
21:20:51.388 -> 
21:20:51.388 -> =====SGP30 test====
21:20:51.388 -> Sensor not found ...........

Hope you can help me out, because this is for me a general problem.
Wont connect several I2C devices to the M5Paper.

Cheers,
Jan

felmue

Hello @Powersoft

the two I2C use Wire (internal) and Wire1 (external). By default the Adafruit library uses Wire, but for M5Paper we want it to use Wire1. Luckily the sgp.begin() function allows to overwrite the default.

Try something like this (untested):

  M5.begin(); // initialises internal I2C (uses Wire)
  Wire1.begin(25, 32); // initialises external I2C (uses Wire1)
  Serial.println("\n\n=====SGP30 test====");

  if (! sgp.begin(&Wire1)){

Hope this works.

Cheers
Felix

Powersoft

Felix, I've tried it and for this device it is working. But when I try it with a BMP280 it is not working. I think it is depending on the header of the program.
I will investigate this further.

Cheers,
Jan

felmue

Hello @Powersoft

thank you for reporting back. I am glad it works - well, at least for this device.

And yes, not all libraries allow for the Wire/Wire1 parameter to be supplied via begin() function call. There are a lot of libraries which have Wire hard coded. In such a case you can modify your local copy of the library to your needs.

Thanks
Felix

Powersoft

@felmue
Is there a principal difference in the I2C approach between the M5Paper and the CORE2?

felmue

Hello @Powersoft

yes and no. They both use a different set of GPIOs for internal and external I2C (unlike M5Stack Fire, Gray, etc., which use the same).

However M5Paper uses Wire for the internal I2C and Wire1 for external I2C. M5Core2 does it the other way round and uses Wire1 for internal I2C and Wire for external I2C.

When M5Core2 came out I thought the assignment makes a lot of sense since a lot of external libraries have Wire hard coded (as I mentioned already) so on M5Core2 those libraries can be used without modification.

Why on M5Paper the M5Stack engineers decided to use it the other way round is anyones guess. If I had to guess it was a different engineer preparing M5Paper than M5Core2, but that is my personal opinion alone.

The other thing is that M5Core2 always initialises Wire1 and Wire can be initialised via a parameter in M5.begin() whereas on M5Paper only Wire is initialised always by default.

Other than that I don't think there are any other differences regarding I2C of this two devices.

Thanks
Felix

Powersoft

I will stop to interface I2C devices to the M5Paper.
Tried to make a connection with various devices, no positive results so far. It is a pity that they have taken this path. Now a number of devices are no longer usable for me on the M5Paper.

felmue

Hello @Powersoft

I am sorry to hear that. I found that sometimes it is helpful to take a break, work on something different for a while and then come back with fresh ideas.

Best of luck!
Felix

Powersoft

Today I rewrote the routines for the BMP280 and BME280 for a single device.
Simple include the source into the main program, and call it.
This is now working as I wont. It takes a afternoon of work!
Now put the finishing touches on the BMP280/BME280.

Would it make sense to post them on the forum when they are ready?

Cheers
Jan

ajb2k3

@powersoft said in M5Paper I2C:

Today I rewrote the routines for the BMP280 and BME280 for a single device.
Simple include the source into the main program, and call it.
This is now working as I wont. It takes a afternoon of work!
Now put the finishing touches on the BMP280/BME280.

Would it make sense to post them on the forum when they are ready?

Cheers
Jan

Hi @Powersoft sorry for the absence, ive had some issues to deal with.
nice work finding the issue.
Create a project in the project forum and post your code and solution in there.

ajb2k3

@powersoft said in M5Paper I2C:

Today I rewrote the routines for the BMP280 and BME280 for a single device.
Simple include the source into the main program, and call it.
This is now working as I wont. It takes a afternoon of work!
Now put the finishing touches on the BMP280/BME280.

Would it make sense to post them on the forum when they are ready?

Cheers
Jan

Hi @Powersoft sorry for the absence, ive had some issues to deal with.
nice work finding the issue.
Create a project in the project forum and post your code and solution in there.